Sunday, January 25, 2015

MOTHER LOVED THE RAIN



"Don't be silly, Wendy, we need the rain!" A regular counter from my mother to my childhood grumblings. Summer in the Hudson Valley would often mean ninety degree plus temps, late July-August, and recurrent, short-term droughts. Mom would water her own garden, large at one time, and then go to Knox's Headquarters to maintain the Jane Colden Garden. Either way, she'd don her old cotton, button-down shirt; faded jeans; plain, rubber boots; go forth to conquer the weeds; dead-head the blossoms; stem the woodchuck's (groundhog's) destruction, and spray susceptible flowers with her natural deer deterrent.

When it did rain, her routine altered to adding a light-weight jacket and eschewing the repellent. Once in a while, I'd help, however, my mother had her set routine. She never said it, but I'd slow her down. Relieved, I clung during rain-soaked days to the indoors like a fussy cat. Luckily, we had a dog who knew to stay near the house. One routine I enjoyed would be to dry him off when he'd leap inside, catching him before my Mom yelled, "Get him before he gets on the furniture!"

High-volumed exclamations were frequent in our home. Of all of us, my father's mood would dampen with the rain. I always found it funny, Dad not wanting my mother to yell, as he had much bigger lungs and would use them daily. Unlike, my Mom, he'd usually display his deep baritone to beckon his family for a favor, or, he'd rant and scold face-to-face with an equally high volume. We may have had northern European roots; yet no one, brother included, acted politely when guests weren't around. In fact, Woody Allen could have substituted my parents for his in that memorable scene in Hannah and Her Sisters when he tells his parents he's converting from Judaism to Catholicism. Behind my parents' closed bedroom door would issue boisterous debates, especially during foul weather. Mother and father were the generation before ground-breaker Deborah Tannen's studies on how men and women communicate. Still, my mother rarely let inclement weather depress her.

Years passed. I began to understand my mother, the gardener, and my mother, the rain enthusiast. For when not tending to her gardens, she would tell me how soothing rain's music could be. During gray weekends, I'd sit in the den playing cards with Dad, reading, or watching television. My mother would be elsewhere in the house, often the kitchen. Among Mom's many talents was her singing. Mom loved when my father would play jazz music or old standards on the stereo to which she'd hum or sing. She'd also cook with the radio on and a melody would arise, as rich and sweet as the Baltimore orioles that nested in the fields across our street.

Caught off guard during a downpour or a sprinkle, on the other hand, Mom would curse the rain. Walking along the road to pick wildflowers or returning to the house from her rock garden, she would grab anything she could find: newspapers, a sweater, gardening gloves, or even a library book to protect her permed, tinted hair. We'd protest. She'd reply: "I don't want to get my hair wet!" Dad and I finally talked her out of using those plastic, folded rain hats; she acquiesced with, "They don't work well-enough anyway."

Mother relished hearing the rain at night. Knowing she wouldn't have to water flowers the next day and savoring the way the rainfall music would help her sleep, like a shaman reaching to the skies to thank the gods, she seemed eerily calm. No, not even thunderstorms could shake her. In contrast, as a child thunder and lightning terrified me. I'd run into my parents room to jump up on my Dad's bed. He would soothe me; Mom would explain why I shouldn't be afraid.

Let it be said I loved my parents. When my father died, very quickly and unexpectedly, I sobbed for a week and felt quick to tears during the months that followed. With my mother, the dramas leading to her death evoked quiet teardrops. The day she died I stopped crying. I didn't cry at her memorial, spreading of her ashes. I've rarely cried since. Cold? No, for I remember how much she wanted us to celebrate her life. She lived until ninety-four. Since Mom died, I've aspired to embrace nature's gifts. But when it rains, I sometimes cry inside.

You see, mother loved the rain.

Sunday, January 11, 2015

A ROSE WITHOUT PETALS: A RALLYING CRY



Rallying cries for unity and action flutter through social media like a windswept newspaper, tossed and tumbled in various directions, until dispersed, flattened. Clarion calls which weeks later grow silent as middle class global citizens return to their average lives. An hour ago I read that world leaders pledged to join the march in Paris today. Good for these diplomats who have chosen to participate, better for  the organizers who want media attention, which they'll receive until the press, at least in the U.S., will return to other newer or more immediate stories. Why am I so cynical? Anyone who has read my earlier blogs would answer its because I've been there. People's Climate March, September 21, 2014.

Yes, constructive dialogue and empirical results--suspension of Keystone Pipeline, cessation of dumping waste in the Great Barrier Reef; China's resolution to restrict carbon-based emissions--have occurred since the climate marches. Still, like that mythical creature Hydra, with every climate victory there are other challenges that directly or indirectly affect what we marched for last year: none more threatening than terrorism and the subsequent squelching of free speech.

Countries, with few exceptions, have a singularity of mind. Whether they be developed, developing or impoverished each nation puts its interests first before the world's. Censorship exists in the West and the East; it grows in leaps and bounds (and I argue press restrictions fan the flames of terrorism). Peacemakers wish to believe that like an innocent flower all we need is to love one another and all will be well. Realists see, on the other hand, that because citizens struggle to live their everyday lives, they have little energy left to join the initiative for peace or free expression or clean air. Well, folks, it's time to find that energy! Use any peaceful means available. Grab your neighbors and links hands, yell, write protests in stone, or help those who can't help themselves make a statement. For if participating countries are limited to those with the power and money, we're looking at a rose that has lost its petals.

The European Union and the United States share similar dissension of their "members" as to what is best for the whole, let alone their parts. To ask these power brokers, and their Eastern allies to become one force against the terrorism plaguing our world wouldn't be enough. For how can the West fight a conflict which is home-grown?

Two dangling petals without the support of the whole will quickly fall to the ground. No, to achieve any hope for our world's people, their children and generations to come, even the smallest, sympathetic nation would need to participate. To give the reins to the West to eradicate terrorism would be to give these countries omnipotence and thereby assign impotence to countries elsewhere.

Every citizen who desires peace can't remain quiet any longer. All ethnicities, creeds, races, will march in spirit with the French people this morning. However, empathy is not enough. No, we must show solidarity through our actions. To conquer this brutal blight, terrorism, we have to suffocate it, eliminate the root causes for its existence--poverty and ignorance. Rally, as a rose blooming so robustly that its thorns are hidden and then cut, for all may share its beauty!






Monday, January 5, 2015

AUTHOR'S QUIBBLE





On the left stands a confident, happy woman enjoying a picnic. On the right is an assured woman, kind of nerdy, who is sharing her small success with her boyfriend. She'd sent him this captioned photo, via text message, to elicit congratulations for winning a "prize" (approximating the call of the Mute Swan).

Two panes of a multi-faceted window. Joi de vivre vs. attention-getter. "Complex" could be the adjective that comes to mind as you read about me. But aren't we all? Should a writer accept all criticism or defend her/his choices? Should she/he be unassuming, humble or shout out to the world, "I have talent, notice me?" If I hear or read one more person's opinion that we "should" behave as the prescriber believes, I may resort to communicism. Don't recognize the term? It's my invention: exorcising all forms of communication with anyone for at least one day to clear one's head of those "shoulds."

I reached this point last month because. . .

a) Three years before, I put myself in a position to be inundated with advice, opinion, and criticism--constructive or not--when I chose to come out of my self-imposed shell to become a writer. Responses have included: "You need to develop a thicker skin." "You've got to believe in your work." "Any mistakes are unacceptable." "It's content that counts." Learning whose opinion to trust has become much harder.

b) When I chose to self-publish my novels, I immediately invited skepticism. Then I announced to some how proud I was to have accomplished not only authoring a book, but to have been encouraged as an emerging novelist by a freelance critic and editor. . .Well, the decision to broadcast, to acknowledge the compliments, caused a backlash. Because I'd taken the bold step to write, I'd expected criticism for my work but not for how I should behave.

c) In this highly competitive industry where the women authors that do succeed often have to have cajones, how could women not call attention to our accomplishments? And is it smarter to be carefree or to provoke scrutiny?

Commercialism dominates self-publishing. Having money almost insures that a novelist will get the best cover designer, editor, publisher, promoter, and even reviews. Yes, if you have $500.00+ to throw away, you too can buy the opportunity to reach critical heights, though with no guarantee of a positive review. (Luckily, I've found established newspaper reviewers who have welcomed my work, free of charge.) Self-publishing means self-marketing.

And formula reigns supreme—several bestselling authors know this—for almost every genre of fiction. When did creativity end and forced plot lines begin? For instance, a writer who has had booming book sales, over three years, had originally been self-published, and followed a profitable formula. 

I won't judge the author's enthusiasm or prolific output, and I'm not going to assign negative criticism of the person's character because I thought the writer's books were poorly written, excluding glaring grammatical errors. What gets under my skin is that the novelist's works were picked up by a well-known publisher and promoted full "blast." Even worse, many fellow readers I've talked to agree that these books needed better editing and proofreading. And yet, the neophyte and the publisher have made millions.

Authors in their day, with few exceptions, once had access to a plethora of editorial staff to edit, proofread and do multiple drafts. I'd bet Hemingway, an infamous example, would never be published these days. Whereas a more populist writer, Victoria Holt, probably would be. Either way, they only had to write. They could depend on their editor/proofreaders to clean up their copy.

I'll finish with this. How can a writer not be overwhelmed by well-meaning friends, professionals and advice-givers on social media? For me the answer is merging the two women you see above. Being insouciant about this chaotic, competitive industry I've entered; being selective about whom to elicit advice from and whom to listen to; learning from mistakes, and congratulating myself on producing quality stories.





Saturday, December 27, 2014

PEACE FROM THE GROUND UP (RE-POST)

(Rocky beach, Cape Cod Bay - All Rights Reserved)
We who celebrate holidays this time of year, often wish each other peace: like wrapping paper enfolding us in hope, future's possibilities. On the other hand, that cellophane's bright colors barely hide what's underneath.We wish each other "Peace," then resume our lives once the celebrations finish. Many return to their daily routine: family, friends, work and after-work activities. Within these structured lives, people lose sight. Wishes don't mean action.

Oscar Hammerstein wrote the iconic lyrics to: "You've Got to Be Carefully Taught." The acclaimed lyricist had prejudice in mind for this song in the musical South Pacific. However, I'd argue that besides prejudice, children are often carefully taught from a young age to fight, to react without thinking. Parents encourage a boy or girl respond to threats with overt aggression. Excluding self-defense, children learn from their parents or parent to hit another child with brute force when emotionally hurt or to impose superiority. Still, hope remains.

As postulated many times, "change comes from within." In contrast, we can't force another person to modulate their ingrained behavior. We can only set an example, as Malala Yousafzai has for others, and hope they'll follow. Where did Malala get this strength, maturity? Her family. When did this belief begin? I'd speculate from early childhood. That's where parents must start.

Not forgetting violence without regard to morality can be internal, not external. As noted in an earlier blog that mental health, including sociopathic and psychotic behavior, left untreated will continue to foster violence and will remain a stigma in any society if left untreated. However, there are other solutions that also must be pursued. For example, among the majority of youth, as long as war inflicts pain upon their families, so will the scars left behind be passed on to these children. Teaching through education, is the only vehicle to stop conflict.

If adults would not only encourage peace amidst chaos, by--spending time speaking at the dinner table or before children go to sleep and sharing anecdotes, prayers, stories that inspire peace, not conflict--our future's promise, what we wish for every year, would be fulfilled.

I don't have children, but have been among them as a teacher. I felt immense joy and sometimes sorrow when with my students. When they'd discuss how they couldn't wait to get back to their video war games or how they looked forward to pummeling their opponents in an athletic competition, I'd listen to their comments then bring in a lesson the next day about humanity. For teenagers, it's often too late to instill the old adage: "Make peace, not war." And yet, great humanitarians, like Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malala Yousafzai, did and do staunchly believe in this tenet. Why? They learned their lessons early.

For me, sitting on the ground in a public place as strangers would walk by me, I'd recall that feeling of being a young child. I'd perceive certain massive, tall passersby as being intimidating, even threatening. Then, my inner voice would spring into action, reminding me not to judge without understanding. In contrast as an adult, street-smarts that I learned, living in big cities, would emerge: it's wise to be afraid of the unknown. Practical in today's violent world, yes; nevertheless, recurring fear can lead to mistrust.

This mistrust, as with recent incidents in our country between police and the community, may then breed violent responses. Moreover, in nations where war dominates every day life, the enemy could be anyone. How can any child resist becoming desensitized, inured to violent acts they see around them?

Though the path may be strewn with land mines, it's up to adults to lead the way. Let's build a bridge between the child who wonders and the adults who learn to fear what they don't understand. Only then will adults learn. Only then will their children embrace peace--from the ground up.

(Google Images)



Friday, December 26, 2014

LOVE CALL

LOVE CALL

The search ended,
And life suspended;
Disease-ridden body failing;
Anxiety flaying;
Where to turn to right the wrong?
Deep inside, where life is strong.

Fought the gnawing anger within;
Fortified my thinning skin;
Focused on the scene ahead;
My soul awakened on the sea bed.

Words on paper released despair;
I rose above the self-impaired;
As my doubts were then released,
My heart opened to a feast.

You knew me like we’d met before,
Parallel worlds which crossed the door,
Two spirits fated to bloom and blend,
We heard the call of love at summer’s end.


Sunday, December 21, 2014

HOLIDAY WISH

SLEIGH RIDE IN VT

With the holidays, celebrate the joy that friendship brings,
The whistling wind as nature sings,
Jubilant bells when winter rings,
Crystal lights like fairies' wings,
And peace beyond all imaginings.



Copyright 2014 Wendy Shreve



Thursday, December 18, 2014

THE HOLIDAYS: WHAT THEY MEAN TO ME

1992
I won't wallow in self-pity. Two weeks ago I had other plans: to skip celebrating--no decorations, music, parties--and buy myself a cooked lobster for Christmas Eve dinner. Hey, it's my right as a New Englander and seafood vendors need the business.

Then, I started a part-time job, met with never-ceasing kindness when least I expected it, repaired some broken fences, and found new life for my latest book.

First, work: I help three mornings a week assisting a furniture restorer with administrative tasks at a center for people with challenges. Such a short time, but the joy that fills the air every time I enter the building invigorates me, makes me smile and takes me out of myself. Some at the center already remember my name. What a blessing.

Second, I've had my own challenges and one agency, mainly run by volunteers, has extended its heart and hands, given me an opportunity to rebuild my life. I've remembered that feeling, which I'd recently taken for granted until last week.

Moreover, life experiences have culminated in, at last, my learning about love. In a carefully constructed bubble, I've avoided the responsibility, the hard work which romantic relationships require. I won't psychoanalyze why I've kept my distance. Nor will I place blame. No one or no thing has the answer to what makes love work: books, television, movies; parents, friends, pundits; head, heart or instincts. As the Humanists asserted during the Renaissance, it's not the answers, it's the questions. I ask myself: what would life be without my man? Why throw away happiness to meet societal expectations pounded in my innocent brain since childhood? Aren't we, my boyfriend and I, fortunate to have a love that many will never know or have a chance to experience?

And then, through the encouragement of others, unselfish writers on Cape Cod, I've found renewed faith in my talent, the courage to show the world my stories. For ShadowwaterDark Sea, Shadowwater II, and the sequel to follow have bestseller potential, yet that's not what I have to prove. No, I will show the publishing world and myself that I'm an author. I will also help others in doing so.

You see, I've begun to understand, with all the heartache around us, why we must continue to celebrate--even if for one day. In 1992, I believed going out to dinner with friends tens of thousands of miles from home on a tropical island and being "merry," could make the holidays more fulfilling. Ten years later celebrating with family meant more. I didn't know, then, that in seven years I'd, unexpectedly lose my father, and three years later, my mother. I continue to cherish those times but not because of what my parents gave me. I value these days not because of what others have shared with me--co-workers, volunteers, my beloved Myles or my writing colleagues. No, I've learned what's made me happiest has been the chance to bring joy to others: the spirit of giving.

31 Years Later