What gets my gut twisting is those "loved ones" who lie allegedly to protect their family or partner. I'd rather be inundated with clichés than to hear one more time: "I did it to protect you." Or, "Why burden you with such mundane details?" Or, the worst, "I've got the situation under control." A tired assertion if there ever was one. When I hear that word, "control," I want to let out a primal scream because few, and I mean few, people actually are in control. We hope our rescue workers, for example, are exemptions, yet even they have their moments. Wiki-How, not a serious source I admit, summarizes the controlling person:
Those who try to control other people are, simply put, neither nice nor respectful. While a controlling personality belongs to someone who probably has deeper issues, such as codependency, narcissism, sociopathic tendencies or just sheer stubbornness, none of these negative traits should be shouldered by you. Controlling people are selfish at the core, immature at heart and likely to put the brakes on your leading a fulfilling life if you're in constant close proximity to them.
I couldn't agree more with the last sentence. Now, that I've exorcised my anger by sharing my thoughts on controlling people, I'll take a step back and make this blog less of a personal diatribe and more about recognizing someone who is distrustful. We've all seen or read multiple discussions about that "how to detect a liar," scenario, but if someone lies are they always distrustful?
Trust and honesty within relationships of any kind aren't necessarily comparable. How many people have implicit trust? (Or are genuinely, consistently honest?) Young children, maybe, and those who follow various theologies have a semblance of certainty. However, I would argue no matter what your background, unless you're a hard-wired psychopath or sociopath, i.e. destined by genetics to be amoral, there is no excuse to be dishonest, hide the truth, especially with those you love, for it leads to mistrust. I'll focus on personal then later familial relationships.
After several episodes with romance, I've begun to compile my own warning signs to not trust someone:
- First, when a man (or a woman) bares his soul to you, focusing on his negative traits and attachment limitations, take the hint.
- When the person states: "It's only a temporary situation." Be wary.
- "We will have more time together in the future," "I'll take care of the problem someday," (As a child,I loathed hearing the word, "Someday."),"Or, "I don't like to make plans." These assertions are more than procrastination. The person is commitment-phobic.
- "It's not just lust." Warning! Warning!
- "I've never been really in love." Often a more subtle sign that your partner hasn't a clue about relationships. That's like Prince Charles stating in his interview with his fiancée, Diana Spencer, "Whatever love means." If I'd heard my soon-to-be husband say that, I would have run for the Highlands! However, I give his Royal Highness credit for being honest and direct. He warned her.
- When you hear "Wouldn't it be wonderful to. . ?" A tell-tale sign of a dreamer, especially if the person does or doesn't follow through on what you both agree would be a wonderful plan or idea. The first time you're disappointed. . .
Some portents listed above also apply to parents, siblings and friends. I've seen enough of the world, studied people, experienced setbacks, listened, watched disastrous events to become hardened but more open-minded. That isn't to say I was always prepared for ensuing crises. When my parents dreams disappeared into ashes (literally and figuratively) because they chose to "protect" me from the truth, for a long time, I lost my trust.
Parents' belief that they are sheltering their child from harsh realities actually makes the child's future more unbearable. Case in point finances: bailing out children over and over again, leaving themselves (the parents) with nothing; breeding co-dependency and entitlement that destroy not only the "rescued" child's sense of ethics and purpose, but affects the extended family not involved in these actions. As a bystander or observer within the family unit, you may try helplessly to fix the breakdown, the dysfunction, only to be left with a sense of innate distrust of those who have hurt you. And yet, some of us don't learn to be more questioning, leery, observant, of the very person or people who can break your heart.
Parents' belief that they are sheltering their child from harsh realities actually makes the child's future more unbearable. Case in point finances: bailing out children over and over again, leaving themselves (the parents) with nothing; breeding co-dependency and entitlement that destroy not only the "rescued" child's sense of ethics and purpose, but affects the extended family not involved in these actions. As a bystander or observer within the family unit, you may try helplessly to fix the breakdown, the dysfunction, only to be left with a sense of innate distrust of those who have hurt you. And yet, some of us don't learn to be more questioning, leery, observant, of the very person or people who can break your heart.
Returning to romantic love, the public is swept away by stories, television, movies, media, reinforced by family and/or friends, that once trust is earned, then true love can begin. My response to that proposition? Trust isn't a goal achieved. It's an evolving emotion or belief. Listen to the cues, process the warnings, and like a smart ship's captain, be aware of the fog, the blindness that can hurt you if you're not on alert. Merriam-Websters' dictionary defines 'trust' as: "firm belief in the reliability, truth, ability, or strength of someone or something."
I only wish I had read this meaning a year ago. I suppose Trust deceives us all.
I only wish I had read this meaning a year ago. I suppose Trust deceives us all.

